CORVALLIS PEOPLE FOR PARKS
The initiative amended the City Charter to require that the voters approve:
Existing law and policy allowed the City to sell these properties without public input and placed these valued community green spaces at risk. Only a Charter Amendment binds future Councils.
Yes. The City Attorney advised the Council that it can ignore or change resolutions or codes to allow sale of parks or natural areas, or to use the lands for other purposes. Only a Charter Amendment is immune to changes by government agencies or the City Council.
Yes, there have been proposals to:
Yes. The Charter Amendment just requires that the voters decide.
Yes. The Amendment doesn't limit conversion to other park uses, as defined in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan.
Yes. In the case of transfer or swap, public process will require a vote of the electorate that may occur at any of four elections throughout a year.
Yes, if the use is temporary (continues for less than two years) and does not leave behind permanent changes to the use of the park or natural area. If the use is for more than two years, then voter approval is required.
No. Construction of new park facilities or expansion of existing structures is part of parks and natural areas management.
No. It does not apply to acquisition of new lands; it applies only to existing parks and natural areas.
Yes. It prevents closed door deals. It ensures that the public is aware of the issues, allows for public debate, and lets the public decide the future of parks and natural areas.
No. It requires Council to present the voters with a choice regarding the sale, trade or transfer of use of for parks and natural areas. No additional administrative review is created.
Yes! That is the purpose of the amendment - to ensure adequate public debate about the merits of such changes and secure approval of the voters who own the parks and natural areas.
Sale of lands purchased with municipal bonds or parks system development charges would expose the city to litigation for using the money for purposes other than what voters approved.
This Charter Amendment honors donors' generosity and assures them - and potential future donors - that parks and natural areas will always remain green spaces available for public use.
No. The Arts Center, Majestic Theater and Osborne Aquatic Center are managed by the department, but they are not in parks or natural areas.
No. School District 509-J owns lands that are currently used as parks. Garfield Park and Wildcat Park are examples. These lands are school grounds and not city parks, so the measure does not apply to them.
No. The city has many structures in parks and natural areas that are used for a wide variety of events. The measure has no effect on such existing uses.
No. Facilities that support Parks and Recreation Department management are necessary to meet the Department's mission.
Parking for parks or natural areas access is a park use and would not require voter approval.
Land acquired by the Corvallis Parks and Recreation Department and used for parks or natural areas should continue to be used for those purposes unless the voters decide otherwise.
Not necessarily. State law allows a local government to create a policy for selling public lands. After the policy is adopted a public hearing is not required for sales of city lands. (Oregon Revised Statutes 221.727)
No. Over the past 45 years only three issues might have invoked this Amendment. Once every fifteen years is not "micromanaging."
The Parks and Recreation Master Plan describes allowed uses of parks and natural areas. The Corvallis Parks Natural Areas and Recreation Advisory Board, a group of volunteer citizens, advises the City Council on parks matters. Park Board recommendations go to the City Council, and are reviewed by the City Attorney.
Organizations with significant resources may try to promote the sale or transfer of a park or natural area (it is unlikely that they would try to protect a park or natural area). The measure ensures a robust public debate on these issues.
A grass roots volunteer committee with a strong interest in our parks and natural areas leads the initiative. Chief petitioners were Stewart Wershow, Audrey Hatch and Phil Hays; Linda Nelson, Treasurer.
No. This was an entirely volunteer-driven initiative.
We need volunteers to help when parks issues arise. Please use the contact button on our web page to volunteer.